Opinion

No Blacks, No Whites, No Yellows, No Reds, No Races Here. Period

Updated 2 years ago Peter McCarthy, David Stone
One Race: Human
One Race: Human
Artwork by Eigenes Werk, Creative Commons License

Way back in 1950, UNESCO issued a statement that there is no biological basis for racial categories. Yet we see race everywhere in our news media, in our neighborhoods, in our culture. Why?

"I never should have made it through twelve years of schooling before entering a university, without ever hearing the important news that most anthropologists reject the concept of biological races," journalist Guy Harrison was quoted in Newsweek for an article, There Is No Such Thing As Race.

Augustin Fuentes wrote, "There are no specific racial genes. There are no genes that make blacks in the USA more susceptible to high blood pressure, just as there are no genes for particular kinds of cancers that can be assigned to only one racial grouping. There is no neurological patterning that distinguishes races from one another, nor are there patterns in muscle development and structure, digestive tracts, hand-eye coordination, or any other such measures," in Psychology Today

And in American Scientist, John Shea wrote, "An anthropologist who proposed using race as a serious way of describing human variability would be laughed out of the profession."

You might think that distinguished, informed opinions like these would demolish the nonsense of race, as Ashley Montagu may have imagined he did with his 1945 book Man's Most Dangerous Myth. But you and he would be wrong.

Look at any newspaper, read about entertainment options, walk through any major city, people are unreasonably thrown into categories based on phony racial characteristics.

And they are phony because, the truth is, we all came out of Africa, all of us, no exceptions. All skin color tells us is how near the Equator our ancestors lived. 

Still, we have "black comedians" and "white voters" and all manner of other human descriptions beginning with a designation of color, which we know or should know means nothing beneath the surface.

Of course, we have embedded in our cultures a structure of social categories into which we wedge blacks, whites, Asians, Hispanics and so forth, ignoring the fact that many "whites" are darker skinned than many "blacks" and Hispanics are so all over the place that jamming them all in a single room and shutting the door makes less sense than Donald Trump's views on Muslims.

Our government embraces the categories as muscularly as our mass media. Census categories are hard set on racial identity, and programs are organized around skin color.

Racism is endemic in our system. It's the American way. It always has been. Wisdom, insight and learning have not been powerful enough to break down the bulwark of ignorance. And the reasons are obvious.

Setting people aside in racial categories is a strategy of power, of the majority sustaining a "them and us" separation that serves the interests of those who reap the most benefits. Regardless of how fair-minded you believe yourself to be, you cannot escape the stigmatizing values associated with skin color and rooted deep in American culture.

But even though this news source is a tiny slice of the media universe, we believe change must start somewhere. Except where it makes sense in opinion pieces such as this one, we will no longer describe individuals according to racial concepts.

It serves no one well to move destructive myths forward. For that reason, Barack Obama will no longer be a "black president," a category used in some circles to diminish the office and in others to uplift it. And we are going to have athletes, entertainers and movies without racial prefixes, hyphenated or otherwise.

We think that will do our small part in clearing air polluted with bad ideas.


Comments powered by Disqus

Assorted Ideas

Sex in Self-Driving Cars: Where do you stand… sit or lie down?

Raise your hand if you’ve had sex in a car. Nobody can see you but me, I promise. Ah, 60%? That’s about right. Now, how many of you would, if you could? The answer is 81% of you say in polls that you’d take the leap, given the opportunity. Of course, opportunities would be fewer … Continue reading Sex in Self-Driving Cars: Where do you stand… sit or lie down? →

Hate Amazon? The New York Times Thinks You Should

It happened again, just a few days ago. June 23rd, 2019, byline David Streitfeld: What Happens After Amazon’s Domination Is Complete? It’s Bookstore Offers Clues… I should be relieved. It showed, once and for all, that the Times had finally moved on from years spent bashing another of my favorite companies, Apple. New York Times … Continue reading Hate Amazon? The New York Times Thinks You Should →

The 1960s, An American Decade of Death

Originally posted on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small:
The 1960s, An American Decade of Death Photo by Gladson Xavier on Pexels.com It’s a cliché that history is written by the winners, and a dishonest one. History is written by all sorts of people. Samuel Eliot Morrison, for example, wrote a history that, by omission, virtually…

The Teachings or Spiritual Selling of Abraham-Hicks Law of Attraction

Originally posted on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small:
The Teachings of Abraham   Excited by my first brush with Abraham-Hicks, pacing around that airport in Buffalo, waiting for my delayed flight, I searched for more when I was back in New York. I went to the website and found the skimpy biographies. Photo by Pixabay…

Proof of Life After Death…

Experts have always told us that nobody can honestly, authoritatively answer the questions about life after death. It’s all a matter of faith — or lack of it, they say. But is that still true? Proofs: A Summary We now know it isn’t. Startling discoveries have given us strong evidence that meet high standards for … Continue reading Proof of Life After Death… →

You purchase helps The Daily Keep publishing...