Progressing and Expanding

Update #2: Briana Warsing Lawsuit Against the Daily, 2nd Grievance Filed

Updated 22 weeks ago David Stone
Briana Warsing (L) with Managing Editor Kelly Turner at Main Street WIRE table, Roosevelt Island Day 2017.
Briana Warsing (L) with Managing Editor Kelly Turner at Main Street WIRE table, Roosevelt Island Day 2017.
Photo credit: Frank Farance

2019 started badly when I received a notice that Briana Warsing moved in State Supreme Court to collect on a default judgment against this writer and this newspaper for $300,000, claiming we did not respond to a Summons and Complaint served ten months earlier, on March 5th, 2018. We fought back.

Updated, March 8th, 2019: After reviewing the Summons and Complaint, based solely on a sworn statement by Briana Warsing and filed against me personally and The Daily, we filed an Attorney Misconduct Grievance against Warsing's Attorney, Marc Jonas Block. On further review and consideration, we have filed a second grievance, this one against Warsing, who is a licensed attorney. Further action is not contemplated until a hearing on April 1st to consider Warsing's demand for a default judgment has taken place. We are seriously considering next steps, depending on the hearing's results.

I hadn't heard from Warsing's attorney, Marc Jonas Block for well over a year, mistakenly assuming that Warsing was satisfied with holding me and The Daily up for public ridicule by presenting their legal complaint to the Roosevelt Islander blog for publication and going no further. 

Otherwise, I wondered, why had they never served the summons?

But, according to Block, he had, on March 5th, 2018, although he was unable to produce any evidence and the only other person involved, a Manhattan Park concierge, said the Block was not being truthful.

And if he did serve the summons in early March, starting the clock on a 20 day response limit, why wait 10 months before arguing that I didn't respond?

During the more than 200 days that elapsed, the Main Street WIRE, under Warsing's watch, failed, going under after 40 years.

Puzzled, I tried to engage Block in a discussion, explaining that I never saw the summons, but he was having none of it, insisting on going for the default. (He did offer a private, confidential meeting with Warsing to discuss a "settlement," assuming I was stupid enough to not realize that agreeing to settlement discussions meant that I accepted liability.)

A friend with some experience in these matters described that gambit as devious.

A date of January 24th sat on the Supreme Court calendar to consider Warsing's motion. After doing my research, unable to afford a lawyer myself, I filed a "motion to oppose," explaining in detail that I was never served the summons.

Instead of agreeing to let Warsing collect on the default, the judge reviewed both motions and delayed a decision until oral arguments can be heard on April 1st.

That's where the lawsuit sits today...

Except...

Until Block notified us of his default motion, because I'd never been served the Summons and Complaint, I hadn't seen Warsing's allegations or Block's arguments supporting them.

Once I had a chance to take a long look, I was alarmed. Very alarmed. 

My first impulse was to try to find a meeting ground. But again, my offer to meet, no strings attached, before things got uglier, was rebuffed by Block. He even shot back that my saying, were we not able to work things out like adults, face to face, I had no choice to defend myself with every tool at my disposal - was a threat.

Since when is defending yourself a threat?

Unable to make any headway toward a resolution with Block, I've filed a detailed grievance against him over what I believe are serious violations of professional rules of conduct in his handing of the lawsuit and related issues.

Although Warsing, also an attorney, seems to have abandoned the profession a decade ago, I'm still considering a specific grievance against her.

Updates will be posted as developments continue.

 

Comments powered by Disqus

Assorted Ideas

Manhattan Park Project Murkier

Manhattan Park’s project at 40 River Road got murkier yesterday, starting with increased ADA concerns and ending with permit questions. On Thursday, we reported that…

Continue reading → Manhattan Park Project Murkier

The post Manhattan Park Project Murkier appeared first on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small.

Last Chance: Salvage Swings in Lighthouse Park

Last Chance: Salvage Swings has one week left in residence on Roosevelt Island. Winner of FIGMENT NYC 2019’s City of Dreams competition, the artwork remains…

Continue reading → Last Chance: Salvage Swings in Lighthouse Park

The post Last Chance: Salvage Swings in Lighthouse Park appeared first on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small.

RIOC Caves at Manhattan Park

Real estate developer, public safety offender, earns RIOC free pass RIOC caves at Manhattan Park, handing them a free pass. For days, the real estate…

Continue reading → RIOC Caves at Manhattan Park

The post RIOC Caves at Manhattan Park appeared first on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small.

Manhattan Park: RIOC Toughens. Briefly

At Manhattan Park, RIOC toughens, then lightens up. Roosevelt Islanders were encouraged when the Roosevelt Island Operating Corp. shut down an illegal construction project. Manhattan…

Continue reading → Manhattan Park: RIOC Toughens. Briefly

The post Manhattan Park: RIOC Toughens. Briefly appeared first on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small.

Manhattan Park Splitting a Community?

Is Manhattan Park splitting a community? Roosevelt Island, New York City’s most unique, economically diverse community is being sliced apart by Starrett. Starrett owns Manhattan…

Continue reading → Manhattan Park Splitting a Community?

The post Manhattan Park Splitting a Community? appeared first on Assorted Ideas, Large & Small.